With the announcement that Yahoo is to support microformats, the semantic web (if not the Semantic Web) enters the mainstream. RDF still doesn’t have a killer app, but the ability to extract context from metadata is with us now. The sector can begin to see where it can use/advance these standards for its content. Perhaps hList is a start.
Sebastian Kruk asked me to distribute the following:
Thanks again for the opportunity to meet with you all.
Could you, please, send around a couple of links?
Irish Digital Libraries Summit (wiki page)- April 20th:
(I would be very happy if someone from your group could participate).
JeromeDL 2.0 is out – Grab your copy [http://blog.corrib.org/?p=4]
Danny Ayers in his ‘raw’ blog: ‘It’s my opinion that only a tiny proportion of the web needs to have rich Semantic Web capabilities for the web as a whole to gain significantly. A handful of superpeers could make a huge difference.’ He also advocates lots of small, local knowledge domain approaches.
Early days, but its Google – can’t ignore it.
The call for papers for DC2007 (http://dublincore.org/workshops/dc2007/cfp/) shows concern with lots of the stuff that’s preoccupied us at the workshops so far, particularly the mapping of knowledge domains through formal SW means and how social tagging can fit in.
One thing which concerned us for some time in Newcastle was the ‘interface’ or possible relationships for users and staff between contextualities built by folksonomy and those more formal structures built by domain experts such as curators. We’re not at the answers stage yet I think, apart from an agreement that both approaches are valuable and can complement each other. Maybe its simplistic but I like to see the ‘formal’ side acting as semantic glue sticking folksonomies together.
Things are moving along elsewhere. DBin looks interesting: http://dbin.org/ RDF semantic tagging of discussions by domain experts. Danny Ayres (Raw) has been blogging about SWAP 2006 in Pisa and this among other things, raised his interest.